Last week I had the chance to sample the completely new 2011 Buick Regal on the roads and highways of Southern California. We’ve been foaming at the mouth at a chance to get behind the wheel of the Regal ever since it was introduced in LA last year. Could the car that was almost a Saturn really deliver as a Buick? Lets find out.
One walk around the Regal and it’s immediately recognize as a Buick, which is a very good thing. Despite being more stylistically reserved than its big brother, the LaCrosse, the Regal looks youthful, classy, and elegant. There are very few hard creases in the bodywork, lending to a fluid in-motion look even while sitting still. It’s impressive considering only minor styling changes were made to convert the Regal from its originally intended form as a Saturn Aura.
The Regal will be avaliable with two engine options; a base four-cylinder and more powerful turbo-charged four cylinder. Both use direct injection. The base four produces 182-horsepower while the turbocharged four (avaliable later this year) increases output to 220-horsepower. Both engines will be mated to a 6-speed automatic and the turbo will have a 6-speed manual as an option.
Buick claims the Regal’s main competitors are the Volvo S60 and Acura TSX. I’ve yet to drive either the Volvo or Acura, so I can’t give direct comparisons. However, in a pure stats game, the Regal is left underpowered compared to the upscale engines in both the S60 (300hp) and TSX(280hp). Only the TSX offers a base four cylinder, of which the Regal bests by 10hp (172hp vs 182hp).
Where Buick really turns on the heat is in price. The Regal starts at a relatively cheap $26,995 for the base four and $29,495 for the turbo. Acura starts their base TSX at $29,310, while an optional V6 starts at $34,850. Volvo offers a turbo-6, which starts the S60 at $37,700. As you can see, the Regal holds a substantial price advantage over both rivals.
The Regal, which is sold as an Opel Insignia in Europe, has a noticably European weighted chassis tuning. In short, the days of Buicks driving like a boat are officially over. The turbo model also has the added benefit of an adaptive suspension and steering system. Called IDCS (Interactive Drive Control System), the car changes steering angle and suspension damping both automatically and with the aid of three driver selectable modes. Buick describes it like this:
“IDCS allows the driver to choose between three different operating modes that change the suspension settings, throttle response, shift pattern and steering sensitivity through the variable effort steering system. The three modes deliver three types of experiences:
Normal – balanced and optimized for all driving situations
Tour – optimized for comfort and relaxed driving on long journeys
Sport – optimized for road holding; enthusiast driving .”
It works largely as advertised. Switching between modes yields a noticeable change in the driving dynamics of the car. It’s really impressive. In fact, the Regal is downright fun in Sport on winding roads. However, push the car and the steering gets noticably foggy and hard to place. It’s not horrendous and 99% of owners will never notice, but you’d never catch an Audi doing the same thing. Base engine models come with an also competent, although stiffer, suspension and steering feel. Both suspensions were extremely well poised on the highway.
The base engine, while not anemic on paper, is embarrassingly slow on the road. I understand it’s the “fuel economy” option, however even in that area it falls short. The I4 is rated at 20mpg city, 30mpg highway. The more powerful turbo I4 only falls slightly behind at 18mpg city and 29mpg highway. The turbo is an overall spectacular engine. It pulls hard from lower RPMs thanks to a twin-scroll turbo and delivers usable power in the middle range. Although I didn’t get a chance to drive the turbo with the six-speed manual, I’d sense it would be the combo to go with.
Inside, the Regal continues to impress. The car extends GM’s recent streak of high quality and high fit & finish interiors. Three console finishes are avaliable; piano black, satin metallic, and Kibo-patterned wood (pictured above). The multimedia infotainment system has a usb/iPhone port, an aux port, supports streaming bluetooth stereo, and bluetooth hands-free phone use. It’s controlled by an iDrive like knob mounted on the middle console. After a few minutes using the system, it’s extremely easy to change settings and navigate menus on the road and without looking down. I do hold two complaints; that the chrome ring around the gear-shift often reflected the sun in my eyes and the mass of brown buttons in the center stack looked overly mono-tone and hard to distinguish at quick glance.
It’s exciting to think that the redesigned 2010 Chevrolet Malibu will be a closely related version of the same platform. I’m personally looking forward to the just announced Regal GS that is due later this year. It will feature an even sportier suspension tuning and a more powerful engine. I can’t wait to sample the Regal in depth more in the future. It’s an intriguing and compelling offering that will continue to drive the Buick Renaissance forward.
Strengths
- Outstanding fit & finish
- Supportive seats- comfortable for hours on end
- Rock solid and unflappable on the highway
Weaknesses
- Base engine is anemic, underpowered and provides little additional fuel mileage
- Rear seats lack headroom, even for average folk
- Adaptive suspension and steering felt ambiguous when pushed too hard (GM says they are still refining software settings)
First Drive Conclusion
Forget the base engine and go with the turbo. It’s an entry level premium car that can hang with more established European rivals in a more affordable wrapper. If you really want a true sports sedan, better wait for the high-performance GS model slated for later this year.
Video Walkaround
2011 Buick Regal Photo Gallery
Required Disclosure: The lodging, transportation, and access to vehicles required to write this article were provided, free of charge, to the author by General Motors. AutoInsane.com routinely accepts such offers from automakers to expand our coverage, however no special treatment, bias, or special consideration is given in return.
Related posts:



















June 3rd, 2010 at 3:52 pm
mmm, you are comparing the 220 Hp luxury Buick to a luxury 300 Hp Volvo?
its like putting a lawn mower engine on a H3 Hummer and saying its cheaper than the H2. duh
June 4th, 2010 at 2:59 pm
This car looks classy and sporty. I test drove the base engine and it had enough power for me, plus it takes regular gas. The handling was very athletic. The interior as good as BMW. The only thing that bugged me was that they removed the cool exhuast from the CXL model (buried up under car??). What’s up with that? It removes a degree of Sporty look. Overall it is a great car that I am considering. I would have bought it already if it had the oval chrome pipes in the ads.
June 6th, 2010 at 9:19 pm
Contrary to what the designer says in the video, the image that this car conveys is that of a Volvo melded with some no name Chinese creation.
He is entirely delusional if he believes that this compares with any of the established Euro brands in terms of performance or style. After two minutes of looking at it, I was of the impression that its styling and “line” are cliched at best.
As the reviewer note very subtly; it is underpowered, handles poorly when pushed and the interior is not fit for purpose for more than two people.
The designers bloviating and excessive gushing, told me that the car was not good enough to stand on its own.
I suggest that GM abandon their Chinese design studio because they are obviously clueless; they should have handed the job over to a Dane or an Italian; Giugaro perhaps, or even bought a BMW 135i or been sent a picture of an Alfa Romeo Brera Coupe, something, anything to drag this bland lump of metal to the point where we the buying public actually believe that GM is going to offer not just “good as” cars but true world beaters. This thing might go down well with the nascent drivers in China, but to anyone who knows how to drive it is utterly worthless.
June 7th, 2010 at 7:38 am
I guess Graham is another person whos feelings are hurt over this one..(probably drives a KIA)…dude the car is German(not china) you had Google right in front of you and still you decide to look stupid(?) Drive the thing BEFORE you whine about it…you’ll look less stupid(and GOOGLE before posting what they told you at the “Tea-Party”…Geez
June 7th, 2010 at 12:40 pm
Well Ron, I guess the designer saying that the car was designed in China was my cue that it was of Chinese design, watch the video and pay attention.
Having just returned from another trip to China and having seen Buicks everywhere, it is obvious to me that it is their target market.
Tea Party? OK no idea what you are babbling about, so try and keep cogent in your argument position.
As for what I drive, not that it’s relevant but we own three cars; Ford Flex, Honda Accord Ex and an old Bristol Brigand from 1984.
I’m about to buy a 2011 Range Rover because it is brilliant; as for KIAs, they are speed bumps; and as for this Buick, like I said it’s worthless.
June 27th, 2010 at 7:48 pm
Another typically stupid GM new car introduction. Pretty nice to look at, but an anemic engine. Must be that all the GM execs are still being driven around in limousines, and don’t drive the products their company is marketing. Sorry GM…another dud! NO SALE!